Change to English interface versionChange to French interface versionChange to Spanish interface versionHome pageClear last query resultsHelp page
Search for specific termsBrowse books by topic categoryBrowse alphabetical list of titlesBrowse books by organizationBrowse by keywords


Display all textExpand table of contentsOpen this page in a new windowDon't highlight search terms
close this bookEpidemiologic Surveillance after Natural Disaster (PAHO - OPS; 1982; 105 pages) [FR] [ES]
close this folderPart 1 : Epidemiologic surveillance and disease control after natural disaster
close this folderChapter 4 : Operational aspects of disease surveillance after disaster
View the documentField investigation of rumors and reports of communicable disease
View the documentGaining access to laboratories to obtain definitive diagnoses and support for epidemiologic investigations
View the documentPresenting epidemiologic information to decision makers
View the documentSurveillance during and after the recovery phase

Surveillance during and after the recovery phase

With increasing passage of time after a disaster, both decision makers and the public become progressively less concerned with the probability of epidemic disease. Initial enthusiasm also wanes for providing emergency health services to affected communities and temporary settlements, and many bilateral and voluntary disaster relief agencies begin phasing out activities. Normal communications and transportation, as well as disease notification systems and control efforts, are restored. The phasing out of the intensified, disaster-related surveillance activities should take place after consultation with members of the national epidemiology group. Certain areas, such as permanent encampments of refugees, may require indefinite special surveillance.

In rural or remote areas, the phasing out of postdisaster surveillance may mean that all notification of disease ceases. Organized effort to maintain effective surveillance in such areas has not, in the few instances when it has been tried, been particularly successful. On the other hand, such an effort has never been of high priority or received significant economic support from authorities of disaster-affected countries or development agencies. In the past several years, however, the Pan American Health Organization has assigned high priority to developing or strengthening epidemiologic surveillance programs after disaster. In some countries, the monitoring of postdisaster recovery in the health sector has been an additional objective.

to previous section to next section

[English]  [French]  [Spanish]