logo2

ugm-logo

Blog

You Should Do to Survive a Natural Disaster

Natural disasters are part and parcel of living in a dynamic system like the planet Earth. But there are some things individuals and nations can do to help prevent unnecessary loss of life from them.

Here we briefly examine some things you can do in the event of a natural disaster. We also look at some of the strategies nations are taking help to predict and protect against them.

Can natural disasters be avoided?

Natural disasters are, unfortunately, something of an occupational hazard on our planet. While many are completely out of our control, e.g. earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, etc, we have slowly been able to develop methods of attempting to predict them.

Many others from droughts to floods can also wreak havoc in many vulnerable communities around the world. 

But it should be noted that natural disasters are probably something of a misnomer. After all, if a hurricane hits a piece of uninhabited land we wouldn't call it a disaster - it would just be considered the weather.

But we digress.

Today, partly thanks to the internet, traditional media, and social media ensure that the latest news of a natural disaster is broadcast almost in real-time. 

The United Nations created a report on just this subject a couple of years ago. Called the WorldRiskReport 2011, it compared various countries around the world and ranked them by their relative ability to cope with extreme natural events. 

"The WorldRiskIndex, developed by UNU-EHS, is the core feature of the report. The index calculates and compares risk values for 173 countries worldwide, and shows regions and countries that face a high disaster risk. 

Countries are ranked based on four key components that take both natural hazards and social factors into account: exposure (to natural hazards and potential risks), susceptibility (likeliness of suffering harm, susceptibility as a function of public infrastructure), coping capacities (governance and capacity to reduce negative consequences of hazards) and adaptive capacities (capacity for long-term social change)." - United Nations University. 

This report makes it clear that disasters are not a case of meteorological or geological phenomena. They can be perturbed by a country's social structures and processes.

“Extreme natural events do not necessarily cause disasters, because risk not only depends on the hazard but is very much determined by social and economic factors,” explained the Scientific Head of the WorldRiskIndex project at UNU-EHS, Dr. Joern Birkmann.

It also highlights that while natural disasters are a real challenge to humans around the world, they don't necessarily need to be disastrous. Better information provision, early warning systems, and well thought out disaster/rescue plans can really help avoid some of the worst outcomes of extreme natural events. 

What is the problem with natural disasters?

Apart from the initial shock, deathtoll, and physical damage from a natural disaster (especially things like tsunamis, earthquakes, etc), there are some compounding issues that can elevate the death toll unnecessarily. 

Serious "acts of God" can cripple vital services like utility supply, food supplies and other trappings of an established community. This can lead to further loss of life from disease, thirst, hunger and other secondary hazards from natural disasters. 

For example, events like earthquakes can lead to the outbreaks of fires as gas lines and electrical lines are ruptured. This can be more dangerous than the initial event in question. 

But there are other problems that can arise from serious natural disasters.

According to sites like restorationmasterfinder.com, here are some common additional issues communities will likely face in the aftermath of a natural disaster. 

1. Mental health issues - Loss of loved ones, possessions, one's home, etc, can seriously affect survivors mental health. This can lead to confusion, grief and even depression that will badly affect sufferer's ability to think and plan clearly. 

2. The spread of diseases - Epidemics of communicable diseases is a common secondary hazard from natural disasters. Disruption of food supplies, clean water, medical services, etc can seriously rout communities. 

If serious enough, large amounts of unburied dead bodies can quickly further devastate a community from pathogens. 

3. Other safety issues - People returning to their homes is another highly risky time after a natural disaster. Unsanitary conditions, pest infestation, chemical and gas leaks, structural weakness, etc of their previous homes can rack up death tolls unnecessarily.

4. They can seriously affect the local economy - Natural disasters can seriously disrupt local economies. So much so, that some can cost billions of dollars.

How can we prevent natural disasters in the future?

It is highly unlikely mankind will ever be able to prevent natural disasters in the future. But we can improve our odds of survival through better prediction and mitigation strategies. 

Earthquake and volcano eruption prediction systems are already commonplace and are improving with each passing year. Following the devastating tsunami in Japan, for example, the country has managed to develop a highly robust and effective prediction system that they hope will prevent the loss of life from similar events in the future. 

Another strategy a country can employ is to build defenses against certain natural disasters. The Netherlands, for example, has spent billions of dollars on an impressive sea wall to help prevent disastrous flooding of any land below sea level. 

natural disasters netherlands
Source: Roberto Malden/Flickr

Countries that have been prone to natural disaster events, like Japan, have also developed building construction standards to help protect buildings from things like earthquakes. 

But ultimately, disasters can strike at any time and place. We will likely never be able to prevent them in the future but can develop methods of reducing the loss of life, and assets, in an event's aftermath. 

Well thought out and tested disaster relief strategies can help save thousands of lives in the event of serious natural events. 

What should you do in natural disasters?

If you find yourself unlucky enough to be in the wrong place at the wrong time, there are some basic things you can do to prevent further harm to you and your loved ones.

  1. Do not return home until told to do so by the authorities;

  2. If you smell gas don't enter a space. If it is in your home, ventilate by opening windows and doors as a matter of urgency. This will also help remove any additional moisture in your home that can lead to toxic mold growth;

  3. Wear protective gear when cleaning up after a disaster;

  4. Only ever use a torch if you must return home. No naked flames!

  5. Never touch any exposed cables or electrical wires (obviously);

  1. Do not turn on the lights or any electrical equipment until you’re sure that there has been no damage to the electrical system in the home

  2. Never use wet electrical appliances! Have household appliances and electrical devices serviced and sanitized before using them. Heating and cooling systems should also be carefully inspected and cleaned before being put back into service;

  3. Rinse all hard surfaces with a garden hose, then scrub them with a heavy-duty cleaner and hot water. Use a solution of chlorine bleach and water for better disinfection. But never mix bleach and ammonia, it will produce toxic fumes;

  4. Chuck away any upholstery or furniture that has been contaminated by sewage or stagnant water for more than 24 hours;

  5. Clean all household items before using them;

  6. Trust your gut - Throw away food and beverages that have been in contact with floodwater or smells or looks bad;

  7. Always boil drinking water;

  8. Keep children/pets away from stagnant water or areas not yet sanitized;

  9. Use insect repellents to avoid vector-borne illnesses and stay away from wild or stray animals!

ADB creates contingent disaster financing for natural disasters

The Asian Development Bank (ADB) disclosed on Thursday that it has created a new financing mechanism to support developing countries in disaster preparedness and response. 

In a statement, ADB said the new contingent disaster financing (CDF) mechanism will strengthen disaster preparedness and provide quick-disbursing budget support following natural disasters.

ADB said the creation of the CDF was approved by ADB’s Board of Directors on Thursday. It aims to support the bank’s Strategy 2030 which aims to increase efforts in tackling climate change and disaster resilience.  

“CDF will provide a quick and flexible source of funds for developing member countries affected by disasters until funds from other sources become available,” said the Director General of ADB’s Strategy, Policy, and Partnerships Department Tomoyuki Kimura. “It will also help promote greater preparedness and risk management in developing member countries prone to disasters.”

The CDF will cover disasters triggered by natural hazards such as typhoons, floods, earthquakes, droughts, and tsunamis. 

It supports essential policy reforms to strengthen disaster preparedness that are to be completed before a natural disaster occurs. Once a CDF is approved for a country, it remains active until a disaster occurs. 

The country can then quickly access the approved financing to help relieve fiscal constraints for urgent relief and recovery efforts. This will prevent disruptive reallocations from priority budget programs.

“Where necessary, CDF disbursements can be accompanied by follow-up assistance through ADB’s other emergency or regular lending instruments to support recovery and reconstruction,” Kimura said.

ADB said the Asia and the Pacific, where its developing member countries are located, is the world’s most natural disaster-prone region. 

Between 2014 and 2017, countries in the region suffered 55 earthquakes, 217 storms and cyclones, and 236 cases of severe flooding, affecting 650 million people and causing about 33,000 deaths, according to the United Nations.

ADB is committed to achieving a prosperous, inclusive, resilient, and sustainable Asia and the Pacific, while sustaining its efforts to eradicate extreme poverty. In 2018, it made commitments of new loans and grants amounting to $21.6 billion.

Japan aims to boost disaster response with more efficient TEC Force

The land ministry is establishing a system to allow for the quick dispatch of workers with civil engineering and other expertise to areas hit by natural disasters, after a succession of torrential downpours and other large-scale calamities hit the nation in recent years.

The Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism Ministry set up an organ in each of its nine regional development bureaus from Hokkaido to Kyushu in the current fiscal year to coordinate the expedited dispatch and training of members of the Technical Emergency Control Force.

 The TEC Force specialist group, which was created to quickly provide technical assistance to local governments affected by large-scale disasters, is tasked with assessing damage and implementing restoration work. It marked its 10th anniversary last year.

As of April, it had 12,654 registered members, many of whom are officials of regional development bureaus.

A total of 80,000 members have so far been sent to areas damaged by more than 90 major disasters, including the Great East Japan Earthquake and tsunami in March 2011.

Reflecting the recent increase in the number of large-scale disasters, members are sent to affected areas roughly 10 times per year, about double the annual figure when the force was established.

At first, the TEC Force provided assistance at the request of local governments, but after the March 2011 disaster, it began offering large-scale support immediately after disasters.

The number of personnel at regional development bureaus has continued to fall, making it difficult for those involved in developing and managing rivers, roads and other forms of infrastructure to concurrently serve as managers of TEC Force members.

To address this, the ministry in April spun off disaster-related sections at the regional bureaus to take charge of the TEC Force members. Each regional bureau now has a specialized team of about 20 for the task.

When a disaster occurs, the team makes the necessary arrangements with local governments, police and fire authorities, the Self-Defense Forces and other organizations or agencies to dispatch TEC Force members. When not responding to a disaster, members conduct training and educational programs.

In a related development, the government will hasten the process for designating seriously damaged areas as being eligible for larger state subsidies in order to facilitate their reconstruction. The ministry believes the swift dispatch of the TEC Force will help facilitate the survey work needed for the designation, ministry officials said.

The ministry is also considering adding specialists from the private sector to the TEC Force, such as engineers with architectural and land-surveying experience.

The TEC Force “needs more members if the possibility of large-scale disasters, such as a quake originating in the Nankai Trough, is taken into account,” a ministry official said, referring to the trough located off the Pacific coast.

The ministry plans to work out a set of specific measures to reinforce the TEC Force, including a new program to train members, starting in fiscal 2020.

Our planet is in crisis. But until we call it a crisis, no one will listen

‘It is time to update the language we use to better reflect the seriousness of global heating.’

When Senator Kamala Harris was asked about climate change during the Democratic debate in June, she did not mince words. “I don’t even call it climate change,” she said. “It’s a climate crisis.”

She’s right – and we, at Columbia University’s National Center for Disaster Preparedness, wish more people would call this crisis what it is.

The language we use to refer to the climate crisis has changed over time, often due to political pressures. In 1975, the geophysicist Wallace S Broecker published the first major paper on planetary heating – Climatic Change: Are We on the Brink of a Pronounced Global Warming? – and for a while the term “global warming” was the most common. But in the decades following, politicians and members of the media began to use the softer, more euphemistic term “climate change” to describe changing weather and atmospheric conditions.

That wasn’t an accident. In the early years of George W Bush’s first term as presidency, scientists were actually making serious progress in establishing overwhelming evidence that we were, in fact, facing a global crisis. Public opinion on climate change was shifting; Americans were curious about how worried they should be by the damage being done to our atmosphere.

Enter Frank Luntz, a renowned Republican pollster and strategist. Luntz was concerned that the Republican party was losing the communications battle. He advised Republicans to cast doubt on scientific consensus on the dangers of greenhouse gases and to publicly hammer home a message of uncertainty.

In 2002, Luntz wrote a memo to Bush urging him and the rest of his party to use the term “climate change” instead of “global warming”. Climate change sounded “less frightening”, he pointed out, “like you’re going from Pittsburgh to Fort Lauderdale”.

Luntz succeeded. “Climate change” began to eclipse “global warming” in the American vernacular, downplaying its menacing predecessor.

Technically, the term climate change makes sense. The climate is, indeed, changing. But the term is far too mild to describe the existential threat to the planet that these changes pose. Jeffrey Sachs, former director of the Earth Institute at Columbia University, agrees. “We should have a term that emphasizes the incredible cost and dangers,” he told us. “We do not need to be shy about this.”

Under the administration of Donald Trump, the situation is even worse. Now, instead of re-framing language about the climate crisis, Republican officials simply remove references to it entirely and put pressure on researchers and analysts who disagree.

It is time to update the language we use to better reflect the seriousness of global heating. “People do not understand the scale and pace of the climate emergency,” Jamie Henn, strategy and communications director for 350.org, an international climate campaign, told us. “This is not an issue with one future date where we will start to see effects. We may hit tipping points at any time in which we will see immediate problems.”

There is no longer any doubt that climate change is an unprecedented planetary emergency. And the terms we use to describe this crisis must deliberately reflect an appropriate sense of urgency.

The good news is that there is already some movement in this direction. Scientists, political leaders and the media have finally begun to abandon climate “change” in favor of “crisis” or “emergency”. This summer, The Guardian updated its style guide to designate “climate emergency, crisis, or breakdown” or “global heating” as better descriptors.

We applaud that decision and we hope that more journalists, politicians, and intellectual leaders will follow suit. The question is, in the current political climate, will the upgraded terminology result in definitive action? We hope so.

  • Caleb Redlener is an undergraduate studying public policy and communications at the Ohio State University and a summer intern at Columbia University’s National Center for Disaster Preparedness

  • Charlotte Jenkins is a master’s of public health candidate at the Mailman School of Public Health at Columbia and a graduate research assistant at Columbia’s National Center for Disaster Preparedness

  • Irwin Redlener directs Columbia’s National Center for Disaster Preparedness and is a professor at the Mailman School of Public Health at Columbia

As the crisis escalates…

… in our natural world, we refuse to turn away from the climate catastrophe and species extinction. For The Guardian, reporting on the environment is a priority. We give reporting on climate, nature and pollution the prominence it deserves, stories which often go unreported by others in the media. At this pivotal time for our species and our planet, we are determined to inform readers about threats, consequences and solutions based on scientific facts, not political prejudice or business interests.

More people are reading and supporting The Guardian’s independent, investigative journalism than ever before. And unlike many news organisations, we have chosen an approach that allows us to keep our journalism accessible to all, regardless of where they live or what they can afford. But we need your ongoing support to keep working as we do.

The Guardian will engage with the most critical issues of our time – from the escalating climate catastrophe to widespread inequality to the influence of big tech on our lives. At a time when factual information is a necessity, we believe that each of us, around the world, deserves access to accurate reporting with integrity at its heart.

Our editorial independence means we set our own agenda and voice our own opinions. Guardian journalism is free from commercial and political bias and not influenced by billionaire owners or shareholders. This means we can give a voice to those less heard, explore where others turn away, and rigorously challenge those in power.

source; theguardian.com

Disaster Preparedness Network Now Fully Operational

The Virgin Islands VHF Emergency Network is being strengthened with improved transmission capabilities and 75 new VHF handsets ahead of the height of the Atlantic Hurricane Season.

Emergency Communications Manager at the Department of Disaster Management (DDM), Jasen Penn said that in the coming weeks the department will be distributing handsets to critical locations around the Territory, such as fire stations, Customs, Immigration and offices on the Sister Islands.

Mr. Penn said, “Some of these offices, which are vital to making sure that different areas of the Territory maintain contact after an emergency, have been relying heavily on their mobile devices since Irma. The radio network is now much more resilient and we want to make sure that it’s accessible to those who need it ahead of the height of the Atlantic Hurricane Season.”

In addition to the new handsets, the Territory’s transmission network is poised to be improved with new or upgraded repeaters, the tower-top technology that sends signals between handsets.

“We have new a repeater to be installed on Sabbath Hill, which will improve communications between Tortola and Virgin Gorda,” Mr. Penn explained, adding that Jost Van Dyke and North Sound will also receive new repeaters, while the Challwell repeater, which facilitates communications with Anegada, is set to be upgraded.

Of the new handsets, 30 were donated by the Governor’s Office, and a further 45 were purchased with funds from the CDB Recovery and Rehabilitation Loan obtained by the Government following the impacts of 2017.

The department expects a full complement of participants for the land-based VHF Radio training course taking place today July 30 and Wednesday, July 31. Further radio training sessions are scheduled for select Government departments in August.

The VHF Radio Network is a critical component of the National Multi-Hazard Alert System managed by the DDM.