logo2

ugm-logo

Blog

Japan's 1995 earthquake offers disaster lessons for today

When a powerful underwater earthquake off the coast of Alaska prompted tsunami advisories and frayed nerves last month along the West Coast and Hawaii, I thought about Kobe, Japan.

I traveled to the city in central Japan’s Hyogo Prefecture and to Tokyo last year with a group of journalists in a trip organized by the country’s foreign press center. I went to get an up-close view of Japanese transit, including the famed bullet trains, but it was the lessons about disaster recovery and preparation during the trip that came to mind, especially in light of the recent onslaught of natural disasters in the U.S. – hurricanes, wildfires, mudslides.

Several journalists from the Seattle area on the trip were intensely interested in lessons  from Kobe's 1995 earthquake because of fears that a major quake could strike along the Pacific Northwest’s Cascadia Subduction Zone, potentially affecting an area stretching from British Columbia to California. 

Last month’s Alaska quake — quite powerful at a magnitude of 7.9 — sparked mostly jitters, with apparently no deaths or significant damage. But the exercise was a reminder that the earth can shift suddenly, and mitigating disaster means making plans. Twenty-three years ago, Kobe suffered an earthquake that transformed the modern, industrial city into an international symbol of devastation, with an elevated expressway toppled like a toy after a child’s tantrum among the most remembered images. 

The 7.3-magnitude quake struck the port city at 5:46 a.m. Jan. 17, 1995, leaving 6,434 dead and 43,794 injured. Almost 250,000 buildings collapsed and 10 years’ worth of fires erupted in three days, requiring massive outside firefighting help and even bucket brigades to tackle the blazes.

The day the shock waves hit Alaska last month was less than a week removed from the anniversary of that infamous earthquake. Both occurred along the Pacific Ring of Fire, an area so named because of its volcanoes and rife with seismic activity. On the same day last month that the quake struck off Alaska’s coast, volcanoes erupted in the Philippines and Japan, and an earthquake shook Indonesia, according to the United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction.

Japan is no stranger to natural disasters, and the quake, known as the Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake, has since been eclipsed in death toll several times over by a near-apocalyptic quake off the country’s eastern coast in March 2011 known by many as the Tohoku quake, which added the accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant to the horror of a 9.0-magnitude temblor and a towering tsunami that washed away entire communities.

Kobe's more recent history suggests a narrative of recovery, even being branded in 2009 as a UNESCO City of Design (it’s a designation that Detroit shared in 2015), but Kobe has never fully recovered economically from the 1995 quake, and Mayor Kizo Hisamoto noted that its previously devastated port operations lost competitiveness to ports in other cities inside and outside the country even after being rebuilt.

The Japanese government came under intense criticism following the Kobe quake. An article published by the nonprofit Asia Foundation in the days after the March 2011 quake noted that the national government was faulted for inadequate early warning, lax building codes and “unsuitable leadership in the relief and recovery effort” after the Kobe earthquake.

Embracing the quakes

Those failures came despite the country’s familiarity with earthquakes and may point to the challenges of remaining prepared for disasters. The country observes Disaster Prevention Day every Sept. 1, and earthquake drills are a part of life. An earthquake simulator, which our group visited at a Tokyo Fire Department location, offered us a dramatic example of how the ground would shift during a quake, sending us scrambling to duck under a table.

Leaders in Kobe appeared to have embraced their city’s quake history and talked of efforts to share what has been learned.

“We believe that by sharing our know-how and the lessons we learned from our earthquake and our experiences that we can make cities all around the world safe from disasters,” according to Yoshihiro Hayashi, a Kobe press officer.

Walk around the city, and the reminders that disaster can strike are evident. Signs point to tsunami evacuation routes, and reminders of the 2011 quake are preserved in very public displays.

Along the city’s waterfront, streetlamps lean at diagonal attention and chunks of concrete from a wharf and twisted metal fencing lie ruptured in seawater at the Port of Kobe Earthquake Memorial Park, testaments to the force nature can apply to man’s attempts at permanence. 

The most visible recognition that this city of 1.5 million, a trip of more than 2½ hours southwest of Tokyo by bullet train, suffered a major disaster stands five stories tall, enclosed in glass but designed to survive a major quake. The cube-shaped Disaster Reduction and Human Renovation Institution is both a memorial and an educational center. The glass is supposed to symbolize transparency in disaster mitigation efforts.

A long way to go

A visit to the institute included showings of films on both the Kobe and 2011 quakes and a walk through a hellish, quake-ravaged model street. Exhibits showed damaged artifacts as well as the kinds of assistance that poured in from around the world in 1995, including stuffed animals.

Teachers were on hand with models to show how buildings can be designed to better withstand a quake, such as by strengthening them with cross braces. In one case, a teacher placed two blocks representing buildings, one with long stakes underneath and another without, into sand she had packed into a clear plastic container. As she turned a hand crank, the unsupported block fell over as the sandy mixture liquefied, but the supported block remained standing.

Building codes have been tightened since the quake, but officials acknowledge that many old buildings have not been retrofitted and would be vulnerable in a quake. 

“We still have a long way to go in order to make it completely safe,” said Hayashi.

The quake severely damaged the underground infrastructure of the city, knocking one of the city’s sewage treatment plants offline for more than three months. In the immediate aftermath of the quake, partitions were dropped into an adjacent canal to close off an area so raw sewage could be dumped somewhere, pending treatment.

Much of the city’s efforts in the years afterward focused on adding redundancy and in making pipes quake resistant. The city also developed 300 temporary toilets, which are stored at places like elementary schools and can be assembled in the event of an emergency, pairing them with stormwater storage tanks for flushing, that can connect into the main sewer. Officials estimated the changes to the sewer system alone cost the equivalent of more than $512 million.

The city also built a large-capacity transmission main, on view by descending eight stories underground, so water would be available in the event of another major disaster. The cost was the equivalent of $340 million. The goals for these infrastructure projects are to keep the systems functioning should disaster strike again. 

Despite these and other changes, such as adding height to the city's seawall, the region largely rebuilt its devastated transportation network as it was, according to Mayor Hisamoto. Officials had weighed putting the expressway referenced earlier underground, but the mayor noted that the cost would be high, a demonstration of the type of budgetary arithmetic which can hold sway around the world, whether bracing for earthquakes in Japan, hurricanes along the U.S. Gulf Coast or even sewage system failures in metro Detroit. 

Contact Eric D. Lawrence: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..">This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Follow him on Twitter: @_ericdlawrence.

UN urges action, long-term measures to tackle disasters

MANILA, Philippines — The United Nations Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) has called on UN member states and the international community to “act now” and ensure long-term measures to tackle natural disasters.

“With devastating floods, hurricanes and earthquakes that have impacted numerous countries, humanitarian response must be complemented by medium and long-term recovery and reconstruction efforts,” the ECOSOC said in a statement issued by its president Marie Chatardová.

X

“Early humanitarian response has been critical for saving lives and livelihoods and the provision of essential services,” Chatardová said following the council’s special meeting on the “Aftermath of recent hurricanes: Achieving a risk-informed and resilient 2030 Agenda” last week.

She said preparedness and partnerships played an essential role in enabling the quick arrival of humanitarian response and emergency supplies during disaster.

Chatardová also issued a statement expressing the council’s condolences to disaster victims and extending solidarity to all the affected people and governments in the hurricane-hit Caribbean, Central America, the United States and Mexico, which was struck by successive earthquakes as well as Africa and South Asia where severe floodings occured.

ECOSOC has been assessing displacements and disruptions to livelihoods of people and their immediate needs such as health, water, sanitation and hygiene, food security and shelter.

It called for greater investment in disaster risk reduction, including preparedness, early warning and early action and urged for greater risk-informed investment in infrastructure and housing.

“We call for stronger collaboration, connectivity and complementarity between humanitarian, development, disaster risk reduction and climate action to define and deliver collective outcomes and to reduce need, risk and vulnerability over multiple years,” said the council.

It said attention must be given to the most vulnerable people facing climate change and extreme weather events.

Elaborating on the measures needed in both the medium and long term, the council called for longer term recovery, development and reconstruction programs, pointing to, among others, the regeneration of industries, including tourism, agriculture and fisheries.

“More importantly, key industries and livelihoods must be made sustainable and resilient to the impacts of future extreme weather events and other hazards. We must support efforts of affected and vulnerable countries to diversify their economies and harness the benefits of digital economy to enhance their economic resilience,” the statement explained.

“We need to act urgently,” council members said, adding that they are committed to continue to promote coordination of UN work in development and progress of countries.

Managing mental health in the midst of disaster

An inmate firefighter monitors flames as a house burns in the Napa wine region in California on October 9, 2017, as multiple wind-driven fires continue to whip through the region. 

After a disaster, a major network of disaster counselors and mental health professional spring into action. Their task? Aid people with the sometimes long and invisible recovery that takes place following a traumatic event.

It could be after a natural disaster, like a hurricane or wildfire. Or a tragedy, like a mass shooting or crime. Either way, there's an important personal recovery that needs to take place — and people whose job it is to help.

Psychologist James Halpern was a first responder at both 9/11 and the Sandy Hook school shooting, which left 20 children dead. He's co-author of the book "Disaster Mental Health Interventions: Core Principles and Practices." He's also a professor emeritus and founding director of the Institute for Disaster Mental Health at SUNY New Paltz.

Halpern joined Marketplace Weekend host Lizzie O'Leary to talk about the role of mental health professionals following a disaster.Below is an edited transcript of the conversation.

Lizzie O’Leary: We are reflecting on the five year anniversary of the Sandy Hook shooting. That's something you responded to. Can you walk us through what happens as a mental health first responder? You know, in that case what do you do?

James Halpern: I was with the families on the second day of the event. There was considerable fear and considerable chaos. We tried to provide some calm and safety. But they also asked us questions like, “How could this have happened to me? How could this have happened to my wonderful child?” And those are not real questions for us counselors. Those are cries or laments. What we can do is offer kindness and compassion and support. But some of the questions they asked, which had to do with how they supported their other children, were real questions. About whether or not the kids could watch these events on TV. And the answer is no. Whether or not it was good for those young children to be interviewed by the press. The answer is no. So, some combination of what might be considered crisis counseling and compassion and support.

O’Leary: What sort of disasters have you responded to and do people like you respond to?

Halpern: Sorry I'm laughing, but yeah, I mean disasters are so common and getting more common, it seems. You know, the United States, people don't appreciate, has the most extreme weather in the world. So in addition to the kind of floods and fires that are most typical, we have a hurricane season. We have a tornado season. We have a wildfire season that seems to be expanding. Of course, we've got earthquakes, explosions, transportation accidents, plane crashes, epidemics, anything that involves considerable human suffering beyond a person.

O’Leary: Listening to the breadth of what you're talking about, what does it cost to provide mental health care for so many people in such a variety of situations? And who pays for that? 

Halpern: In the early stages of disaster, crisis counseling is typically free. There are 5,000 mental health professionals deployed around the country by the Red Cross. These are psychologists, social workers, mental health counselors, who give up their time and energy to provide that kind of pro bono service. There's also county, state, federal workers who, similarly, can be at shelters or family assistance centers. Now, over time some significant minority can develop long-term symptoms. And those folks are treated by professionals with health care, Medicare, Medicaid, private insurance. And depending on the nature of the disaster it can be supported by the federal government. For instance, if the disaster was a crime, like the Las Vegas shooting or 9/11, then there’s support from crime victims services for long-term care.

O’Leary: You know, I'm thinking about Puerto Rico. I just came back from a trip reporting on the island and that’s a place with significant devastation. I would imagine that the kinds of mental health services required over time change dramatically as we move farther out from the event itself.

Halpern: Most folks experience significant but transient symptoms. They're OK and don't need that long-term help. On the other hand, there's some considerable research from the gulf oil spill where it leads to long-term economic dislocation, job loss. You see significant depression that needs to be addressed.

O’Leary: There’s a study from the National Institute of Mental Health that says it would have cost about $12.5 billion to provide what they call “comprehensive mental health care for 24 months” to the people affected by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Make the economic argument for me, the cost benefit analysis, of why that money is worth spending on mental health.

Halpern: These are disaster survivors who certainly bear no blame for being in the middle of these kinds of events. They are suffering. There is job loss. And those treatments work. We can reduce, then, long-term problems in substance abuse, in family violence, and family conflict, and individual suffering. There's enormous benefit that we get when people are functioning effectively.

O’Leary: Do you think as a country we have made any collective strides in understanding that mental health is something worth spending money on?

Halpern: I think there is much less stigma now. It can be a struggle to find resources to cover those invisible wounds. I think easier, probably, to find resources for injuries and illnesses than for those invisible scars.

O’Leary: Is it hard to find the people who need help, after all a disaster can scatter survivors all over the place?

Halpern: Yes. I think that we could do better at providing more comprehensive screening, which would not be very costly. And there are, in fact, check lists where we can identify folks who are likely to have serious mental health problems.

O’Leary: What's the impact on the people who do this work? I would imagine this is not easy.

Halpern: There are of course the obvious physical hazards. But for all responders, including mental health counselors, there's listening to stories of trauma repeatedly, which can result in compassion fatigue. Or burnout. Or vicarious trauma, that you can begin to feel traumatized yourself just by hearing those stories secondhand. And, again, I think that that puts all responders at risk, and why it's so important for all of those responders, and all of us as counselors to have very careful self care plans.

Debts add to disaster for climate-hit nations

Antigua and Barbuda after Hurricane Irma.

For many countries impacted by the negative impacts of climate change, much more money is leaving in debt payments than they receive in grants to cope with climate impacts (Theresa May: It’s Britain’s duty to help nations hit by climate change, 12 December).

Even before this autumn’s devastating hurricanes, Caribbean countries were suffering under unsustainable debts caused by the legacy of colonialism, unjust trade rules, harsh austerity measures imposed in return for bailouts, and past disasters. Now countries such as Antigua and Barbuda, and Dominica, are expected to keep paying debts while struggling to rebuild.

One of the main “solutions” proposed to this cycle of climate-induced disasters and indebtedness is climate risk insurance. This fundamentally unjust measure places the financial burden of climate impacts on people who have done the least to cause the problem of climate change, while ensuring that creditors keep being paid in the event of climate disasters. Instead, debt cancellation is needed to make debts sustainable, and all assistance to adapt to – and rebuild from – climate disasters must be in the form of grants, not loans.
Sarah-Jayne Clifton
Director, Jubilee Debt Campaign

Theresa May’s article failed to explain how the fight to limit climate change is helped by fracking, by the building of Hinckley Point with its absurd overpricing of the cost of each unit of electricity (another example of Conservatives milking citizens to benefit commerce), by the third runway at Heathrow or by her government’s refusal to include environmental costs in the calculation of the value of gross national product, another example of said welfare state.

Her stock answer to demands for more being spent on (for example) the NHS is that increased interest payments on borrowing cannot be borne because they will prejudice future generations, yet the threat to future generations from the effects of climate change is immeasurably greater. Moreover, May has no qualms in leaving future generations with the burden of guarding spent nuclear fuel for hundreds of years. The inadequacy of her policies is plain.
Ian Tysh
Wealden Green party, East Sussex

Flooding persists in 7 southern provinces

Floods persist in seven southern provinces, with more than 900,000 people affected by inundations that have resulted in 22 deaths over the past 15 days.

The northeastern monsoon that began on Nov 25 has brought flooding to 11 southern provinces: Pattani, Yala, Songkhla, Phatthalung, Trang, Satun, Chumphon, Narathiwat, Nakhon Sri Thammarat, Surat Thani and Krabi, 

The floods, which have claimed 22 lives so far, still persist in seven provinces, with 903,603 people from 3,077 villages in 56 districts enduring hardship, Chayapol Thitisak, director-general of the Department of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation, said on Saturday.

The seven provinces are Pattani, Songkhla, Phatthalung, Trang, Chumphon, Nakhon Sri Thammarat and Surat Thani, he said.

In Pattani, Nong Chik and Muang districts are still inundated. In Songkhla, the affected areas are Sathing Phra, Khuan Niang, Singha Nakhon, Krasae Srin, Bang Klam and Ranot districts. In Phatthalung, Khuan Khanun, Sri Banphot, Sri Nakharin, Kong Ra, Pak Phayun, Pa Phayom, Pa Bon, Khao Chaison, Bang Kaew and Tamot are affected.

In Trang, Muang, Na Yong, Wang Wiset, and Kantang districts are still inundated. In Chumphon, flooding remains in Lamae, Muang, Thung Tako, Pathiu, Phato, Sawi and Lang Suan.

In Nakhon Sri Thammarat, water levels remain high in eight districts: Cha-uat, Bang Khan, Chian Yai, Chulabhorn, Thung Song, Pak Phanang, Sichon, Na Bon, Chawang, Nop Phi Tham, Hua Sai, Chalerm Prakiat, Phommakhiri, Thung Yai, Chang Klang, Ron Phibun, Tha Sala and Tham Phannara.

In Surat Thani, seven districts -- Phrasaeng, Wiang Sa, Khian Sa, Ban Na San, Ban Na Doem, Phunphin and Don Sak -- are flooded.